Sadie! Sadie!

Hadda dream that Zadie Smith asked me to babysit two kittens.

She and her husband, an older Jewish man, had somewhere to go. He was involved in classical music of some kind, possibly a conductor or composer; seemed like a nice guy.

One cat was incontinent, one only inconvenient … Zadie and her mensch were neither, just hadda go, quickly, somewhere to be, somewhere important that evening, and they seemed pretty aplomb to leave the kits with me, tho I gathered it wasn’t irrelevant, this thing they were asking me to do. 

The whole thing was surely related to having read some of her new Intimations, a collection of short items, interrogatories, in-timey moments — intimations, really — that have flowed from her pen and the pandemic over the last couple months. A piece about peonies [tho not really, but hey, she’s the writer, so if she says they’re peonies], one that opens on Trump telling the truth, several about people she knows from walking distance in her New York neighborhood or working at NYU. Then 26 basically bulleted bits on people clearly closer to her than even one’s masseur.

I didn’t like the first 30 or so pages, except for the first part of the first essay which talks about how writing is control — which I realized I hadn’t considered before but agreed with; twin actions we tend to like in reading essays — but from the second part on, nope nope nope — through about 30 pages of if-true-it-is-truly-horrifying material — people doing absolutely nothing with life, and for lousy reasons, now including the writers.

Got to where I was hating it.

This was weird because I consider myself a fan. Which is also weird because I haven’t read any of her novels and prolly only a half-dozen or so essays. Her Harper’s piece on Get Out, which I didn’t even read until a few years after it and the film, got me finally to watch it.

Things picked up in the 40s — the short slim volume is 102 pages all-in, from the double-quote epigraph [Marcus Aurelius, Grace Paley] to the back-facing page endnote that royalties go to New York City coronavirus relief and the Equal Justice Initiative. Hey, I saw that movie in the theaters.

By then, there’d come a comment [hers] on the difference between what not working for a day meant to her and to the masseur, whom she calls Ben, and a realization [mine] that earlier I saw her to be accepting and agreeing with what she saw whereas now she’d begun simply to render it.

Much better.

So by the time I was barely half-done I’d decided what I thought about the whole thing — something one might even avoid doing when all-done.

I felt entirely justified in two senses: first and most importantly it was simply right for me to do do this when an essayer has so gravely erred and second, oddly less vitally so given its foundational role for the first point, that my assessment had been accurate.

There’s some that’s OK and a lot that’s wrong with each of those.

OK, yeah, at some point all we have are our perceptions. But that shd be an early point and a whole lotta work to do as/if we continue. And yes, we shd hold views and believe what we believe and be strong and confident in and about them or, among other issues if we don’t, why even bother?

Worse, tho, is that my adjudication doesn’t account for what essays are for — what they are, period.

I’ve lately begun finally to pursue a particular project that by definition and design [there’s naught I can do there] contains essays which will be incomplete. They’ll read from beginning through muddle to end and include all three … as Peter DeVries required of novels … but each one cd be, and perhaps properly shd be much longer — it’s a matter of respect, really — to rightly treat of an instance that I’ll barely be giving an instant at 5,000+ words.

And I cd be as wrong on that as I might be about Smith here, bec as I said, she seemed at first to be too keenly agreeing and accepting instead of rendering.

Was she?

An essay is an attempt, a try, and Zadie Smith even says straight up, right up front that of the ‘historical, analytical, political … comprehensive’ books that will be written about this year, ‘This is not any of those.’ The book is her try to

‘organize some of the feelings and thoughts that events,
so far, have provoked in my, in those scraps of time the
year itself has allowed.’

The attempts are ‘above all personal … small by definition, short by necessity.’

Add to that my judging violating the thing I was ticked about her doing.

What kind of a lousy reader writer thinker am I, anyway?

Wd I want someone doing that about this?

Well, by that time I was tired enough to try and get some more sleep, which was also an effective, if somewhat sheepish way to get out, to end my embarrassment and more at receiving her work in this way, even after her warning, even after my thoughts, already thunk, about what essays are — and after, decades ago, not just talking about but also teaching them in ways which, as my reaction and later responses to Intimations, were at and for the time OK, but now seem terribly mistaken.

Went. Dreamt. Awoke.

Occurred to me as I sat down to write that Zadie is a form of Sadie. Moment later realized that Sadie! Sadie! is just ‘zackly what a mensch might mutter — rather too loudly — if they were going to be late for their evening out.

I shd mention as well that the kittens were of course quite cute. Mostly they wanted me to play with them — serious bidness with kittens, as we you know — and only sometimes called for attention — not even by miaowing; just by being — and in the end I washed the expressive one in the kitchen sink, which had in the dream one of those little sprayer thingies, and dried it with a soft towel magically provided on the counter for just that purpose.

They were soft and warm and alive, slept a bit and cuddled, and had sharp claws.

By the end of the vision, the mixed-media-memory of reading, writing — marginalia, lots of marginalia — uncertain sleep — bec. I’d napped four hours the day before and was unlikely to be sleeping long or well for the bulk of the evening and what dreams are, anyway, no matter what the inputs … by the end of it, I say [and aren’t dreams delineated, beginning and end, arbitrarily? When we sleep they start. When we awake they end.] Zadie Smith was sitting on a couch I don’t have and I at a desk that didn’t look like mine, wrote.

I stole a glance or two at her — she’s lovely, after all — and she was wearing some kind of head covering … not the red one in the widely used image but something meshy that seemed almost surgical, hospital-issued. Her hair was cropped short too — as for an operation or illness.

Sadie! What’s it all mean?!?

Dreams are weird.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


True Romance

Mentioned last week the Manic Pixie Dream Girl, a term used in film to refer to a female — not a woman, mark you, but a girl or perhaps female, depending on the level of [im]maturity — who exists in a story not for herself, more deeply not as a Self, but only for the

Read More »

On Real

Learned of late that several people — at least three husbands in young marriages, two with young children, everyone in his 20s — had not only never read The Velveteen Rabbit … but hadn’t heard of it. That sorta explains why it’s public domain and I can link to it here. Also explains why when

Read More »

Subjective, Objective

The other day I wrote on a wing and a whim … and misremembering. Or as Prufrock put it, quoting Woman — That is not it at all, That is not what I meant, at all. Nearly nothing I recalled happened in that way. Except of course the recalling. And a bit more. Wasn’t a

Read More »

People do the Craziest Things

Adam — did he do what he did for love? Did he say, ‘I will join her; I can’t bear to be without her.’ — is that how it went down? He at after Eve; was it because he’d rather skulk around the earth a sojourner and pilgrim at the mercy of the people in that

Read More »


One Day One

The birds start by 0315 here, which is when I awoke this morning. They didn’t do it, make me wake-up, they’re not roosters after all, but it was odd, since in summer-coming season — the annual-but-always-unexpected late Spring overcast SoCal days with weather-people broadcasting [good weather word!] ‘plenty of heat on its way’, or the

Read More »

Not Free

During the Cold War there was a list of countries and their level of freedom. It still exists but we pay less attention to it.  I recall three categories — very free, free, not free — and I remember ratings were based on politics, economics, and so on. So too in man. We are very free, free,

Read More »

Drudge Report

Babies need not to be taught a trade, but to be introduced to a world. To put the matter shortly, woman is generally shut up in a house with a human being at the time when he asks all the questions that there are, and some that there aren’t. It would be odd if she

Read More »

Columbo: Why We Watch

This is part one of a two-part post on why, some 45 years later, we still watch Columbo. Part two is here. This essay is excerpted from The Columbo Case Files: Season One, found here. Thank you. * For my wedding, I asked for and received the Columbo DVD collection. Complete to that point, it ended

Read More »


Metered Sins

Poetry’s a sneaky bastard. All the time sidling up to one on false pretenses — ‘It’s just the one’ … ‘We won’t intrude’ — and they’re all lies damn one’s eyes! Lies-damned-lies and no need for statistics and the pile of warm laundry does not diminish and soon loses its warmth and begins to glower

Read More »

Through the Mist

My daughter has for about 15 years known a stuffed purple rabbit, insouciantly named ‘Rabbito’. She’s quite a handful. The rabbit, I mean, tho come to mention it … Anyway. I provide the voice. Rabbito tends to suffix ‘-ito’ to words — I am Papito, for instance — an ‘l’ in most any location is

Read More »

Not For Teacher

There’s an unfortunate instructor-y thing where the guy on stage [I’ve found it’s usually a male doing this] asks a question he already knows the answer to, one of the people in the audience … err, classroom … is the target, the answer given is wrong, and the stagehand just goes and gives the answer

Read More »

Protective Covering

A wayback bit of my memory mentions to me how George Thorogood and Bob Seger each felt, responded, etc., when asked to play their single most widely known songs — which are of course this one and this one, respectively — for live shows. Elements of the discussion — one article, with thoughts from both?

Read More »