How Long O Overlords?

How many more evangelical celebrity figures have to shoot themselves before the church industry stops putting men and women on stages and the rest of evangelical fandom stops putting them on pedestals.

This time it was Darrin Patrick. Eight months ago — the news broke on Suicide Awareness Day — it was Jarrid Wilson. Which itself ‘follow[ed] a number of high-profile suicides among pastors’ one news report said.

Accounts of such deaths are invariably filled with cliché and bromides from other ‘top’ (that is, famous) evangelical ‘leaders’, usually of a megachurch or some organization — ministry, in Christianese — that has become a dominant — or even a solitary ‘go-to’ — for whatever area one has a ‘need’.

  • Financial woes? … Dave Ramsey.
    [the late Ron Blue was the prior Christian gen’s go-to guy on this.]
  • Professional development? Michael Hyatt, of course.
  • Masculinity? Hmm … Promise Keepers, then John Eldredge, then …
  • Marriage? There were those weekend seminars … oh, still are? New name, though, right?
  • Parenting? Well, usedta was Focus on the Family; my kids are grown so I guess I’m not sure on this anymore.

Factly, I’m so blessedly not ‘plugged-in’ [connected … circling back … echoing … resonating with … coming alongside of … in this season … for such a time as this … ] contemporary evangelicalism that I just do not know who the top evangellyfish* are these days

I do know all ‘-isms’ of any kind are where ideas go to seed, and not the good kind …

Christians worship celebrity and turn average (that is, flawed) people into ‘rock stars’ as often and as badly as every other affinity group.

Must be something in the water.

Our plan is not working.

+

The problem isn’t the tendency to turn ordinary folk into celebrities; that is so widespread, so everywhere that it’s definitely in the water — the water of our cells, the water covering 70% of the planet, in the water we drink and the air we breathe.

The problem is we don’t do anything to stop it.

Do we need megachurches? Did we ever?

Because all the cool kids outside the church had them [under different names, a’course].

Patrick, discussing his departure a few years back from a common kind of prominent role in this farce, said his ‘fall’ had come in part due to all the pressure of being a leader — you know, that crafting image work [called ‘branding’ outside the Church, and sometimes in it], and how ‘you have to have a social media presence.’

Really? Why?

Couldn’t you pastor a church with a couple hundred people in it, over time get to know the families pretty well, never let a church grow to more than, say, 1,000 — and even that’s too high; 300 to 500 would be better — and have a different building on t’other side of the county, for those folks.

And so on, and so on.

+

It’s not just that I’m not plugged in; it’s that I’ve been paying some attention, and aping the world’s mode — churches as arenas, pastors as ballers, ‘worship’ leaders who are Christians so ‘lead guitarist’ is a non-starter — is a bad plan.

Which, I may’ve mentioned, isn’t working.

Proof of this comes in the reports every time one of these sad men, it is usually the men, kill themselves.

Even in the article they are elevated.

With Patrick, for instance

  • One commenter said he’d cried more in the last 24 hours (hearing of his friend’s death) than he had in 24 years. This is metaphor of course — hyperbole for effect … at least one hopes. But why’s there a felt need to be over-the-top? Have anything to do with a constant need to be over-the-top? And that one is speaking to an outlet for disseminating information on a global scale?
  • One very prominent guy indeed, check the link, said Patrick wdnt in his return to pastoring following more than two years of work of restoration and repentance — an excellent thing — have called himself a ‘success story’ … quite right. The question is, why wd anyone who knows, truly knows, of sin and redemption, like say a very prominent guy, any Christian who’s sinned and suffered ever use that term? Why is it even a question as to whether he is one or not? None of are.
  • Patrick at one point said he was part of a group of young pastors offered all kinds of bling — ‘book deals, speaking gigs, fame and money’ — but they were too immature to handle it. Then why oh why were they pastors? The immaturity noted was the general spiritual kind, not immature as pastors, which young ones a’course would be — and wd be expected to be. Perhaps instead of book deals and the ‘gigs’ at high-profile conferences (as unneeded as megachurches), we could offer them mentors?

And why in the hell — I mean that quite literally — would there be any such thing Patrick could refer to as ‘fame and money’? Oh, right — bec that’s what we do offer young and immature sports stars, for instance.

Why was Patrick ‘spending a lot of energy creating and sustaining’ his image? WTF?

+

One anecdote in the article quoted someone who said he still called a query Patrick used to offer prospects … that is, real live people who didn’t seem yet to follow Christ … ‘the Darrin question’. This is the one that goes ‘How’s that workin’ out for ya?’

First, this zinger is another cliché. It’s extremely common and it has been for years.

Second, it’s not particular good. Unless it’s asked in earnest, ‘So … hey, truly, tell me how that works for you, what it looks like in the life you want?’ — which wd be just fine — it implies the person isn’t terribly bright.

Third, lots of Christians can tell of how life often seems to suck as they try to follow Christ and plenty of pagans wd be perfectly happy, and happy to discuss why they’re happy.

Both parties in the previous paragraph cd be mistaken but the query in question is not especially cogent.

It’s simply clever and glib or was at one time.

That plan isn’t working, either.

 

 

* evangellyfish: creature cruising along just
below the surface of the water, spineless,
smells fishy, prone to lash out when poked,
stinging anything it comes in contact with,
hasn’t evolved one tittle in 10 billion years.

 

Image: Wikipedia; ToBeDaniel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent

Can We Tawk?

Comedienne Joan Rivers’ catchphrase was, ‘Can we talk?’ with all that that entails — its rhetorical nature, the Jewish thing, an implication that at least one of the parties will be better off for having done so … Like God. T’other day a priest spoke of ontological remembrance, the immediate and ongoing memory of past-present-future

Read More »

Hide and See

Something lost, Dallas Willard said once, might yet be very valuable. One’s car keys for instance. He was speaking somewhat in the context of salvation, if I recall … the general point was calling something lost doesn’t mean it’s not wanted — quite the opposite. Yet it remains … until finding its way out or being found

Read More »

Greater Love Blah Blah Blah

Do we doubt locals thanked them for their service? I’m not equating the two. They were wrong; glad we crushed them. Only noting it’s likely they thought as much about such things as we do, which is to say not much. German citizens who believed their leaders, loved their country, watched their sons get on

Read More »

Dark Eyed Life

According to @CitizenScreen, doing yeoman’s* work daily on Twitter* relative to the Golden Age of film, today is the birth date of Mabel Normand, Hedy Lamarr, and Dorothy Dandridge — Normand: New York, 1892 Lamarr: Vienna, 1914 Dandridge: Cleveland, 1922 — which makes for coupla at least interesting, if not compelling or fascinating at the

Read More »

Random

Are You Jackin’ With Me?

The one thing I know about The Dark Knight Rises is that it’s the most boring action movie I’ve seen in years, and yes, I saw The Expendables. But it might not be an action movie. So apart from the surety there, my thoughts remain roundaboutly, which is just, considering the movie itself. And the

Read More »

Too Old For This

You know the line. Usually spoken by an ersatz Bruce Willis type, it is well past cliché, sliding in safely but awkwardly beyond its years to self-parody, as predictable as the pablum in which it appears. [And note, I like every other Die Hard movie.] And yet, here I am: Too old for this. I

Read More »

Mad Men: The Imploding Don Draper

It took me the better part of two seasons to realize the story of “Mad Men” was the story of the self-destructing Don Draper. Then again, it took Draper himself at least three. And as the bright and shining lie he’d crafted, arced and crashed at his feet — represented in real time by his

Read More »

Related

Room Where It Happens

If the line between good and evil cuts through the human heart there’s gotta be some overlap. The lovely mesh seems so far to last oh … about forever and it occurred this morning it will never quite be clean this side of the fundy conception of the Jordan. Even Dr. Willard, averring as he

Read More »

No It Won’t

I don’t think that quotation means what we think it means. Beauty will not save the world and anyway Dostoevsky didn’t say it and anyways he didn’t mean it neither. The line that’s led to our clichéd abuse of the idea’s akin to ‘Eskimos have 418 words for snow’ and ‘it takes 21 days to

Read More »

Tubercular Dude

Did not know this until just now but a few weeks ago was World Tuberculosis Day, which honors the date the TB bacterium was discovered in 1882. The CDC says no ‘celebration’ until it is eliminated. The discovery came with its own pandemic, killing 1 in 7. From the safety of 140 years thence, this

Read More »

Ensamples

Among the worst things about The Slap is how it has fed self-righteousness in all but the two participants, and they already had it or it wldn’t have happened. But there is Solzhenitsyn, again, with the line between good and evil that cuts through every human heart, and there is Dostoevsky, always, reminding us via

Read More »