Drinking the Seth Godin … Milk

Drinking the Godin Koolaid

Motivator Manipulator Maven

Which is he?

I’m going with maven.

Maven may be one of those words we’ve lost sight of, like integrity. Integrity means “wholeness” but we’ve reduced it to “honesty.” So too mavenwhich means “connoisseur” — has been ironicized, demeaned really, into something like “one who condescends” referring to someone looking down his nose at the rest of us plebes on some item or issue.

Actually, the first two words maintain that relationship we have with the third. We’re either looking up to someone to get us to do … the thing … we need to do, or we’re imagining them looking down at us as they try to make us do … the thing … they want us to do.

I’m speaking mainly here of responses to his books, in the form of Amazon reviews. I’ve read bits of Permission Marketing free online. Heard Tribes as audiobook, read All Marketers are Liars and … one other book whose title I can’t remember just now. Not being able to remember it plays right into the critics’ side, the ones who’re voting manipulator in the multiple choice question above.

His books are all the same, they’d say, and do. He says nothing new, or nothing at all, in each one.

Well the other one is Poke the Box, but though I’ve recalled it, their criticism sometimes seems valid. At least, his books can sound like a whole lotta li’l nuthin’, just blowsy and bullshit and no help at all. I’m on Linchpin now, though, and it’s finally start to make sense, the differences between those books, the very specific counsel he does give … and I still see, having been there, why some don’t get him.

The motivator voter will say (and they do) that Godin’s a god, or the bomb, or whatever the kids say these days. They can see how this one book is about this and how that other book is about that.

Repeat. Etc.

But the two voting blocs disagree about the repetition and the et cetera.

What they miss, or rather each get a part of, is that Mr. Godin is very good at saying things direct and well. Many of us get one or the other; most people get neither.

Consider the sentiment, You’re a jackass. Say it needs to be said.

There’s a way to say that direct or well or neither. And there’s a way to say it both and he does. We can be smacked with the two-by-four and wanting to murder the man who did it. Or we can hear someone gone all flowery on us, no substance, but we know what’s really going on (well, sometimes) and we want to spit on the man who won’t say what he means. The guy who does the first is direct; the one going with flowery is trying (and failing) for well.

Seth Godin does both. He can annoy us but his words help. That’s why he’s a maven. He appreciates — in the classical sense — what he’s doing. It matters not one whit what we think — and not either way, I’ll add.

Objections one way or t’other aren’t jealousy or envy (I can never remember the difference), though they may be both. You’re pissed because you don’t have it, haven’t figured it out, aren’t committed … and pissed because he does and has and is. And in addition to jealousy or envy, it is a pile of ignorance or carelessness. And the problem is, you have to care.

Or you won’t get him at all.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent

Can We Tawk?

Comedienne Joan Rivers’ catchphrase was, ‘Can we talk?’ with all that that entails — its rhetorical nature, the Jewish thing, an implication that at least one of the parties will be better off for having done so … Like God. T’other day a priest spoke of ontological remembrance, the immediate and ongoing memory of past-present-future

Read More »

Hide and See

Something lost, Dallas Willard said once, might yet be very valuable. One’s car keys for instance. He was speaking somewhat in the context of salvation, if I recall … the general point was calling something lost doesn’t mean it’s not wanted — quite the opposite. Yet it remains … until finding its way out or being found

Read More »

Greater Love Blah Blah Blah

Do we doubt locals thanked them for their service? I’m not equating the two. They were wrong; glad we crushed them. Only noting it’s likely they thought as much about such things as we do, which is to say not much. German citizens who believed their leaders, loved their country, watched their sons get on

Read More »

Dark Eyed Life

According to @CitizenScreen, doing yeoman’s* work daily on Twitter* relative to the Golden Age of film, today is the birth date of Mabel Normand, Hedy Lamarr, and Dorothy Dandridge — Normand: New York, 1892 Lamarr: Vienna, 1914 Dandridge: Cleveland, 1922 — which makes for coupla at least interesting, if not compelling or fascinating at the

Read More »

Random

The Smart Young Student

Then a student came up to Him and said, “Teacher, what must I do to get an A?” And the Teacher said, “Now you want to know? Now you care — and you think I can help? Look, to get an ‘A’ just do the things that get an A: think critically, run the spell-check, yes, you need

Read More »

Subjective, Objective

The other day I wrote on a wing and a whim … and misremembering. Or as Prufrock put it, quoting Woman — That is not it at all, That is not what I meant, at all. Nearly nothing I recalled happened in that way. Except of course the recalling. And a bit more. Wasn’t a

Read More »

Dirty Rotten Scoundrel

Some of my best friends have a problem with the dirty poor. These are the folks below the dirt-poor — which describes a financial level not the person himself. These are the dirt-encrusted, unemployed, possibly begging (relying on strangers, kindness, and a fair economy as much as the rest of us, anyway), frequently transient (the weather

Read More »

Jesus FAIL

They killed him yesterday and it was awful, as you might expect. Crucifixion, like a common criminal — but he wasn’t common, though now he’s a criminal. He broke their laws, which I guess are our laws. No. He confirmed our Law. Justice: fulfill the Law. But the Romans didn’t want justice; they wanted quiet.

Read More »

Related

Chiclet Chick Lit

In virtue of two females in the house reading it I have discovered a new (to me) genre and given it a new (to all) name, which title appears as the title of this post. Hermione is patron saint of females pre-sexual still satiated when tittering gleefully over Nancy Drew and Ned Nickerson, with New

Read More »

Mad Men: The Imploding Don Draper

It took me the better part of two seasons to realize the story of “Mad Men” was the story of the self-destructing Don Draper. Then again, it took Draper himself at least three. And as the bright and shining lie he’d crafted, arced and crashed at his feet — represented in real time by his

Read More »

Tesla Girl

Someone the other day called Elon Musk both an “inventor” and “a badass” but he is neither. Let me say flat-out, upfront, and clearly it’s good that Musk — entrepreneur behind the Tesla carmaker, companies involved in solar power and space exploration, and who was previously part of PayPal — is alive. We need people like him

Read More »

I Wish I Had Written This Post

If you could do it, I suppose, it would be a good idea to live your life in a straight line — starting, say, in the Dark Wood of Error, and proceeding by logical steps through Hell and Purgatory and into Heaven. Or you could take the King’s Highway past the appropriately named dangers, toils,

Read More »